Lorentzian (Cauchy-Lorentz) Profile
The characteristic heavy-tailed peak profile describing natural radiative lifetime broadening and collisional damping.
Mathematical Formulation
y = y0 + (2 * A / pi) * (gamma / (4 * (x - mu)^2 + gamma^2))Parameters & Physical Meanings
Detailed parameter breakdown, standard units, valid mathematical constraints, and initial guess heuristic algorithms.
| Symbol | Name | Unit | Constraints | Physical Interpretation | Initial Guess Heuristic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $y_0$ | Baseline Offset | Intensity a.u. | unconstrained | Constant background intensity level | Estimated from min(y) or median of boundary points |
| $A$ | Integrated Peak Area | Intensity · Spectral unit | A > 0 | Total integrated spectral power under the Lorentzian line profile | Calculated as (max(y) - y0) * gamma_init * pi / 2 |
| $\mu$ | Peak Center Position | Wavenumber / Frequency | min(x) <= mu <= max(x) | Resonance center frequency of the optical or magnetic transition | Location of maximum peak intensity: x[argmax(y)] |
| $\gamma$ | Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) | Spectral units | gamma > 0 | Direct measure of full line width at half-peak amplitude (gamma = FWHM = 2 * HWHM) | Direct measurement of width between half-maximum points |
When to Choose This Model
- Fitting homogeneous lifetime-broadened optical transitions in solid-state and molecular physics
- Deconvolving Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) chemical shift resonances
- Analyzing Raman active phonon modes in crystalline lattices with finite damping
- Modeling Fabry-Perot optical cavity transmission resonance peaks
Typical Scientific Applications
- NMR Spectroscopy peak integration
- Crystalline Raman vibrational mode analysis
- Optical microcavity Q-factor estimation
- Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) absorption fitting
Expected Fit Profile & Curve Morphology
Shape: peakExample Dataset & Expected Fit Output
Synthetic 25-point Raman active phonon mode with heavy Lorentzian tails
Expected Converged Parameters
- y05.120
- A612.400
- mu520.010
- gamma4.020
Sample Experimental Vectors (19 points)
| # | x (Independent) | y (Observed) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 480.000 | 5.600 |
| 2 | 490.000 | 6.400 |
| 3 | 500.000 | 8.200 |
| 4 | 505.000 | 10.300 |
| 5 | 510.000 | 15.600 |
| 6 | 514.000 | 28.400 |
| 7 | 516.000 | 45.200 |
| 8 | 518.000 | 78.600 |
| + 11 more points available in AltaiPlot preset | ||
Python / SciPy Reference Implementation
Reference library: scipy.optimize (Levenberg-Marquardt).Exact parameterization parity verified.
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
def lorentzian_model(x, y0, A, mu, gamma):
return y0 + (2.0 * A / np.pi) * (gamma / (4.0 * (x - mu)**2 + gamma**2))
y0_init = np.min(y_data)
mu_init = x_data[np.argmax(y_data)]
peak_height = np.max(y_data) - y0_init
# Approximate FWHM (gamma)
half_height = y0_init + peak_height / 2.0
indices = np.where(y_data >= half_height)[0]
gamma_init = np.max(x_data[indices]) - np.min(x_data[indices]) if len(indices) > 1 else (np.max(x_data) - np.min(x_data)) / 10.0
A_init = peak_height * gamma_init * np.pi / 2.0
p0 = [y0_init, max(A_init, 1e-6), mu_init, max(gamma_init, 1e-6)]
bounds = ([-np.inf, 0, np.min(x_data), 1e-12], [np.inf, np.inf, np.max(x_data), np.inf])
popt, pcov = curve_fit(lorentzian_model, x_data, y_data, p0=p0, bounds=bounds)Comparative & Alternative Models
Key decision trade-offs between this model and related functional alternatives:
Gaussian Peak Profile
The fundamental symmetric bell-shaped peak model describing thermal Doppler broadening and instrumental slit resolution.
Pseudo-Voigt Profile
A linear combination of Gaussian and Lorentzian functions providing high-speed approximation of Voigt profile line shapes.
Frequently Asked Questions (Lorentzian (Cauchy-Lorentz) Profile)
Why are Lorentzian fits more sensitive to baseline noise in the tails than Gaussian fits?
Because Lorentzian decay is algebraic (1/x²) compared to Gaussian exponential decay (exp(-x²)). The wide wings extend far from the peak center, making accurate baseline correction essential before fitting.
Scientific References & Citations
- Marshall, A. G., & Verdun, F. R. (1990). Fourier Transforms in NMR, Optical, and Mass Spectrometry. Elsevier Science.[Source / DOI]